www

“The company investigated building these plants in NZ and found it was uneconomic”. Evan Maehl, Waste Management NZ.

North & South magazine reporter George Driver asked New Zealand’s two largest waste management companies whether they would support ‘Project Kea’, and their response was NO. “I don’t want to state the obvious,” he says, “But you’ve got the largest waste company in New Zealand, which used to be owned by a Chinese company that operated 10 of these facilities in China, so why aren’t we doing it?” – Evan Maehl, managing director – Waste Management NZ. Read N&S Article Will SIRRL require the importation of waste to feed ‘Project Kea’ ? Below, you can read more about the composition of the waste South Island Resource Recovery Limited intends to burn and where they claim they will source that waste. WASTE

“The company investigated building these plants in NZ and found it was uneconomic”. Evan Maehl, Waste Management NZ. Read More »

Waste dumper owing millions now in Australia.

A man who owed almost $3 million after abandoning thousands of bales of rubbish on land in Christchurch is now living in Australia. In September 2023, the High Court ordered Michael Denis Corcoran to pay his landlord $2.8 million. Now, he is being chased for bankruptcy.Corcoran’s ERP Group company had been unlawfully storing baled waste at several locations in and around Christchurch. Mr Corcoran said he had been baling the waste for a proposed Waste-to-Energy plant in Waimate. Read Article here See below for more on Michael Corcoran and ERP Group’s involvement with Renew Energy Limited. ERP GROUP

Waste dumper owing millions now in Australia. Read More »

Major fire at AVR’s waste-to-energy plant in Rozenburg, Netherlands.

Following a devastating fire at its Rozenburg plant, which destroyed the power plant section of the facility, WtE company AVR has had to divert the incoming municipal solid waste away from the plant. When operational, the plant processes 1.3 million tonnes of waste per year. The diverted waste will be taken to a landfill in Tilburg and stored until the plant is again operational. Read Article Here

Major fire at AVR’s waste-to-energy plant in Rozenburg, Netherlands. Read More »

Lithium-ion Battery fire shuts down major Tokyo waste disposal facility.

The incident severely damaged the facility’s conveyor belt, which transports waste for crushing, and the equipment that separates garbage from metal. The facility’s yard, where waste is stored, is currently at full capacity, further exacerbating the situation. Security camera footage revealed that a battery pack containing lithium-ion batteries ignited, leading to a series of explosions. The warehouse was empty at the time, preventing any potential injuries. Read Full Article

Lithium-ion Battery fire shuts down major Tokyo waste disposal facility. Read More »

Bee’s needs: Why air pollution matters to pollinators.

This Natural England article on the GOV.UK website highlights how air pollution, including nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) produced from the combustion of plastics, has devastating effects on pollinator insects. This should be of concern to all of us, not least the food-producing shareholders of Renew Energy Limited (REL), the New Zealand arm of South Island Resource Recovery Limited (SIRRL) Read Article Here

Bee’s needs: Why air pollution matters to pollinators. Read More »

The real NIMBY’S: Food producing shareholders of Renew Energy Ltd.

A honey producer, winemaker and grain grower make up some of the shareholders and directors of a company wanting to build a huge rubbish incinerator, BUT NOT IN THEIR BACKYARDS, in the heart of a food-producing district in Waimate.Philip Alfred Leslie Cropp is a honey producer based in Nelson. Paul Robert Taylor is a cereal grain and seed grower from the Ashburton area. Robert Bruce Grey is a wine grower from the Nelson region. What all these food growers have in common is a significant shareholding in Renew Energy Limited (REL), the New Zealand company with a 40% stake in South Island Resource Recovery Limited (SIRRL), the company behind ‘Project Kea’. See below for more on the shareholders of Renew Energy Limited (REL) REL Shareholders

The real NIMBY’S: Food producing shareholders of Renew Energy Ltd. Read More »

environment, industry, industrial smoke-4787978.jpg

The dirty truth about waste to energy incineration is that it just doesn’t stack up.

Why is Waste-to-Energy incineration a bad idea for Aotearoa?  In this article, Michael Szarbo from Greenpeace asks the question, ‘How is a heavily state-subsidised Chinese W-t-E model going to work in NZ?’ and why any NZ council would be foolhardy to sign any contracts with SIRRL or any other W-t-E company.   Read Article here Competitive waste market Waste-to-energy companies in China claim subsidies and tax breaks from the Government by claiming to be renewable energy providers. These companies are also sometimes exempt from waste disposal tariffs. These incentives have seen a boom in waste-to-energy builds, and companies are eager to claim the economic advantages.However, these incentives don’t exist in New Zealand. This means any plant in Aotearoa would need to burn as much waste as possible to produce revenue from gate fees and the sale of generated electricity. This incentive encourages the plant operators to burn as much waste as possible to create electricity. Without the required 365,000 tonnes of waste the company intends to burn, ‘Project Kea’ would run at a loss.In New Zealand, waste management companies and councils play a significant role in controlling the waste stream, often with shareholder stakes in landfills. For SIRRL to be competitive in this market, two things are required: available waste and the ability to provide significantly lower gate fees as an incentive to draw customers. While lower gate fees may incentivise customers to support waste-to-energy, they also reduce potential revenue. Waste management companies in New Zealand have raised questions about SIRRL’s stated available waste calculations. This is a significant concern, as the accuracy of these calculations directly impacts the company’s ability to compete in the waste-to-energy market. 

The dirty truth about waste to energy incineration is that it just doesn’t stack up. Read More »

Recidivist W-t-E company groom yet another council.

A proposal to build a Kaipara-based $730 million waste-to-energy incinerator to burn Northlands waste has the backing of Kaipara mayor Craig Jepson. The proposal will involve South Island Resource Recovery Limited (SIRRL). This will be SIRRL and their shareholder company Renew Energy Limited’s (REL) fourth attempt at building a W-t-E plant in NZ. Previous proposals have included Westport, Hokitika and Waimate. The Waimate proposal was referred to the Environment Court in August 2023 and is currently stalled until SIRRL lodges the required water take consent and satisfies a request for more information about the proposal from the EPA. The proposed Kaipara facility’s capacity would be double that of the Waimate plant, incinerating about 730,000 tonnes of Auckland and Northland rubbish each year. “We’re at an exciting point where all the parts are coming together,” Kaipara Mayor Craig Jepson said of the proposed Kaipara plant. Jepson said he wanted the Government to fast-track the plant’s consent rather than go through Northland Regional Council and his council. However, Zero Waste advocate Sue Coutts said it was important to consider the incinerator’s climate, environmental, and health impacts as part of any consenting process, whether via the councils or the Government’s fast-tracking for major infrastructure projects. Coutts said international waste-to-energy companies were looking for countries with weak regulations to sell their wares because European demand had dropped off. “They head to small communities with very limited resources to investigate the impacts of incinerators,” Coutts said. She said the proposed facility went against Northland’s renewable energy push. Mayor Jepson has been eager to spruik the so-called benefits of Waste-to-Energy. Jepson has been a waste-to-energy advocate for 25 years, since his three-year involvement with investment company Olivine NZ as a shareholder and spokesman in the failed then $223m bid to convert the former Meremere power station to a waste-to-energy plant, which was canned in 2000. Jepson stated that the Kaipara plant would have major benefits with a range of products resulting from its waste processing. It would create 72MW of electricity annually, enough to feed the national grid for 165,000 homes. It would also produce 210 tonnes of construction aggregate, such as gravel. Its steam could be used by Fonterra’s Maungaturoto dairy factory, while fly ash produced by incineration could be turned into glass and concrete. “We’ve heard it all before” – Robert Ireland, Why Waste Waimate. Why Waste Waimate, a group with over 200 members, formed in opposition to the Waimate proposal after public information sessions held by the company were found to be “lacking any real information.” Why Waste Waimate spokesperson Robert Ireland said. “We were given all the shiny embellishments, the greenwashing and Eurowashing,  jobs for locals, aggregate recovery, generating enough electricity to power tens of thousands of homes, a better alternative to landfills, etcetera, etcetera. However, it’s the information they don’t tell you that’s the most important.” These well-rehearsed salesmen sold us a narrative that was quite different from what was presented in their resource consent application. It turns out that there are regulations in NZ that prohibit the recovery of aggregates from incinerator ash.” Ireland said. These discrepancies should raise a red flag for all of us, serving as a stark reminder to remain vigilant and question the information we are given.  SIRRL’s resource consent application states that the Waimate plant, will produce 100,000 tonnes of ash each year, which will be landfilled. Kaipara mayor Craig Jepson stated the Kaipara plant would produce 210,000 tonnes of “construction aggregate” annually. All this talk about providing better solutions to landfills that don’t involve burying waste in the ground for future generations to deal with. However, landfilling will play a major part in Project Kea’s operations. They kept that and the need to use huge amounts of diesel to run the plant out of the promotional material. SIRRL claims that Project Kea will produce 20-30MW of electricity, enough to power 60,000 homes. “They state this as if they intend to provide electricity to local homes. However, they also state they will provide electricity and steam to local industry, but, when questioned on whether the company has any agreements with Oceania(the only neighbouring industry), the answer was no.” Ireland said. Now we have the Kaipara Mayor, Craig Jepson, the latest in a long list of small town mayors putting support behind SIRRL and Renew Energy.  However Jepson seems to be leap-frogging logic. Without any proposal, the Mayor is wanting to have his concept expedite the approval process and bypass regulatory requirements via the government’s proposed Fast-Track legislation.    “Jepson may have taken some liberty around what support means.” Moko Tepania, Northland Mayor. Kaipara mayor claimed support for the Kaipara proposal, including Northland, Whangārei and Auckland mayors. However, Northland Mayor Moko Tepania and Whangārei Mayor Vince Cocurullo were circumspect when approached by Local Democracy Reporting to confirm their support. Tepania, in an email sent to plant opponent Caren Davis, said it appeared Jepson may have taken “some liberty around what ‘support’ means”. Jepson admitted later that he had perhaps oversold the council’s support

Recidivist W-t-E company groom yet another council. Read More »

ECan and EPA request further information from SIRRL.

Environment Canterbury and Waimate District Council request more information from SIRRL. ECan stated that the requested information is required to assist in preparing the Key Issues report, which the Council will be required to provide to the EPA under S149G RMA. The 22-page request by ECan included Dr Emily Wilton’s assessment of SIRRL’s air quality emissions report, for which Wilton requested further information from SIRRL. Dr Wilton’s notes highlighted “inconsistencies” between the company’s operational, technical overview and air quality assessment reports in SIRRL’s resource consent application. Read ECan request here “It’s important for the people to have answers” – Paul Taylor, SIRRL. In an April 2023 Stuff article, director Paul Taylor said SIRRL had gone to the “next level” in many of the reports they commissioned, which “were not necessarily required”, but they did it “because we felt it’s important for the people to be able to have answers to those questions.”  As July 2024 rolls around, ‘the people’ still await ‘answers to those questions’, suggesting SIRRL continue to believe information about this proposal is ‘not necessarily required’.

ECan and EPA request further information from SIRRL. Read More »

W-t-E Proposal to be decided in Environment Court.

After receiving an extensive recommendation report from the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA), Environment Minister David Parker has referred the Project Kea proposal to the Environment Court. On 31 August 2023, the Minister for the Environment ‘called in’, or issued a direction, to refer the application to the Environment Court. The direction was issued under section 142(2) of the Resource Management Act (RMA).The Minister asked the EPA for advice on whether the application was of national significance and, if so, whether it should be referred to a Board of Inquiry or the Environment Court. EPA’s role in the processing of ‘Project Kea”. The EPA will publicly notify SIRRL’s application so people can make submissions. Then, they will pass on the application and the submissions to the Environment Court, setting the timeframe for the next steps in the process. The EPA is not involved in the decision-making process. The EPA states they are organising public notification of the direction and the applications under section 149C of the RMA. They also state that they will provide further information about public notification and the submission process on their webpage when it becomes available.   Also available on the EPA’s webpage: The Minister for the Environment’s direction to refer the application to the Environment Court (PDF, 398KB) EPA advice about referring the SIRRL application to the Environment Court (PDF, 2.8MB) EPA Website

W-t-E Proposal to be decided in Environment Court. Read More »