www

“ERP Group had taken on the risk of the project and “it certainly had nothing to do with SIRRL.” – Taylor, SIRRL director.

After baling and storing waste illegally in and around Christchurch, several abatement notices were issued, and ERP Group was eventually placed into liquidation. SIRRL director told N&S that “it certainly had nothing to do with SIRRL.” However, Environment Canterbury documents state that Renew Energy Limited (REL is the 40% NZ shareholder of SIRRL) owned the baled waste and had applied for the resource consent to store the waste near Christchurch. At the same time, ERP Group held the resource consent for the transfer station there. ERP Group owner Michael Corcoran stated that he was baling the waste to fuel a W-t-E proposal in Waimate. Read full N&S Article For more on ERP Group and Renew Energy Limited (REL), see Below ERP Group REL

“ERP Group had taken on the risk of the project and “it certainly had nothing to do with SIRRL.” – Taylor, SIRRL director. Read More »

“We would never embark on a plant if we thought that we were likely to have to import waste.”

Renew Energy managing director Paul Taylor is adamant SIRRL won’t import waste, telling North & South reporter George Driver, “we would never embark on a plant if we thought that we were likely to have to import waste”. However, in 2018, when Stuff asked why the company was pursuing Westport as a location for its incinerator, Renew Energy’s then-chief executive David McGregor said; “One of the reasons for Westport was because of the port facilities. We can bring material from the [Pacific] Islands and Australia.” Furthermore, in November 2018, McGregor briefed Buller councillors on the Westport proposal. In that briefing, McGregor said, “The plant would also help retain Westport Port because some waste would be shipped in.”   In September 2021, SIRRL hosted information sessions at the Waimate Event Centre, the Waitaki Council solid waste officer Steve Clarke asked Taylor if the company would import waste in the event it couldn’t acquire the 365,000 tonnes required each year. Taylor’s reply was, “We haven’t really considered it.”   Read more on Taylor and McGregors comments below. Stuff article REL briefing to West Coast councillors N&S Article here

“We would never embark on a plant if we thought that we were likely to have to import waste.” Read More »

Councils, Runanga, request ministerial call in of rubbish incinerator proposal.

Environment Canterbury, Waimate District Council and local Runanga request ministerial call-in of Project Kea.Requests were also made by Why Waste Waimate, Zero Waste Network and the Waimate Doctors. In a bizarre turn of events SIRRL also makes a call-in request after contesting councils request.The councils’ request to the Minister was based on the following crucial Resource Management Act criteria: The proposal has aroused widespread public concern or interest regarding itsactual or likely effect on the environment (including the global environment); The proposal involves or is likely to involve a significant use of natural andphysical resources;  The proposal involves or is likely to involve technology, processes or methodsthat are new to New Zealand and that may affect its environment; The proposal is likely to be significant in terms of section 8 of the RMA;  The proposal affects more than one region or district. Read more

Councils, Runanga, request ministerial call in of rubbish incinerator proposal. Read More »

North & South article highlights company’s chequered history.

Failed West Coast proposals, unlawful storage of waste, corruption, and importing waste. Director Paul Taylor claims he doesn’t know when asked about Chinese government involvement in Project Kea, but N&S unravels the truth. In 2016, government agency New Zealand Trade and Enterprise (NZTE) contributed $50,000 towards a feasibility study for a plant in Westport — it was never published due to commercial confidentiality. Then, in February 2018, regional economic development minister Shane Jones announced $350,000 of funding for another feasibility study as the government launched its $3 billion Provincial Growth Fund. This funding came despite the MFE advising that the proposal was “highly unlikely to be economically viable” and stating that Waste-to-energy plants tended to require an enormous volume of rubbish to be viable and were typically built near big cities, not in isolated towns with a population of about 4000 people. The MFE advice also said waste-to-energy plants generally reduced recycling rates and threatened new investment in waste-reduction infrastructure and products because burning waste would become an easy alternative. “Although waste-to-energy (incineration) is used in other parts of the world to generate electricity, it is a technology that comes with a range of negative environmental impacts, human health concerns, and high financial costs… even the latest technologies still emit large quantities of greenhouse gases and release a range of harmful pollutants, such as toxic metals and dioxins, that can contaminate our land and water.”   Read full N&S article here

North & South article highlights company’s chequered history. Read More »

Contentious Feilding waste-to-energy plant proposal withdrawn due to “technicalities”.

Zero Waste Network general manager Dorte Wray said members were “absolutely thrilled for the community, for the climate, and for a real zero-waste solution.” This proposal was shocking, as it is a failed technology all over the world. It doesn’t work, and it is incredibly toxic and polluting.” The proposed waste-to-energy pyrolysis facility in Feilding will not proceed after the applicant, Bioplant Manawatū NZ Limited, withdrew its discharge to air resource consent application with Horizons Regional Council. Thanks to the efforts and continued persistence of Ngāti Kauwhata, Feilding Against Incineration community group, and members of the Manawatū community opposing the proposal, a great outcome has been achieved for the community and the environment. Learn more

Contentious Feilding waste-to-energy plant proposal withdrawn due to “technicalities”. Read More »

Waimate, district – population of 8320.”They will be able to power their CITY with the residues they have produced.” – Herman Sioen, SIRRL.

Self-proclaimed waste-to-energy expert and SIRRL director Herman Sioen claims Project Kea is “Best of the best.” “It goes one step beyond what would be normal practice in Europe. For every potential risk, there is a double system; if one would fail for some reason, there is always a second system that takes over and ensures the emissions are ok.” When SIRRL returned to Waimate in March 2023, they hosted what they termed “information sharing sessions” to provide more information about the Project Kea incineration plant proposed for Waimate. Mr Sioen repeatedly referred to W-t-E practices in European cities, providing incentives for W-t-E in Europe that don’t exist in little old Waimate. Incentives for building plants in highly populated areas, servicing central heating requirements, proximity to waste sources, and the scarcity of land for landfilling. Mr Sioen said, “If you take a hot shower in Paris, the chances are the rubbish from the day before has provided the hot water.” Comments like these underscore the Significant discrepancy between the European and Waimate contexts. Read more

Waimate, district – population of 8320.”They will be able to power their CITY with the residues they have produced.” – Herman Sioen, SIRRL. Read More »

SIRRL director Paul Taylor describes Chinese plant as “Rolls Royce” of W-t-E plants.

When SIRRL director Paul Taylor recently described Project Kea as the “Rolls Royce” of W-t-E plants, it resurrected the story of the Geely GE. The Chinese-built GE was widely regarded as a knock-off of the Rolls Royce Phantom, offered for a fraction of the price of the Phantom. Sound familiar?  Was the GE built to the same exacting standard as the Phantom? Did it carry the same level of engineering and componentry? Of course not!   Project Kea’s budget of NZ$350 million is significantly lower than similar-sized W-t-E plants in Europe, which can cost up to three times as much. This stark contrast raises concerns about the potential risks and feasibility of the project. SIRRL consistently assures us that the Waimate plant will not just meet but exceed European standards. The Project Kea website showcases the Amager Bakke Waste to Energy plant, with its rooftop ski slope, in an attempt to show how well W-t-E plants can integrate within the community. However, it’s important to note that the Copenhagen plant, which serves as a benchmark, costs over NZ$1 billion to build. Amager Bakke is not without its failings and highlights how over-capacity-built plants without available waste feedstocks lead to the importation of waste and the burning of recyclable material. It’s a stark reality that New Zealand lacks specific regulations for Waste-to-Energy (W-t-E) plants. The 33-year-old Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) still regulates NZ’s air emission standards, highlighting the urgent need for updated and specific regulations in this sector. The $350 million budget is suggested to be well below what is required to adhere to the standards of European plants. Can we expect that SIRRL will provide more than is legally required in NZ? There is no evidence to suggest that the plant will be required to adhere to any standards that don’t exist in NZ. 

SIRRL director Paul Taylor describes Chinese plant as “Rolls Royce” of W-t-E plants. Read More »

Florida W-t-E plant burns for nearly 3 weeks. Report shows plant has had four fires in last four years.

Despite the efforts of 100 firefighters, the Doral W-t-E plant fire took nearly three weeks to extinguish. This incident, along with the closure of schools and local evacuations due to air quality concerns, is not an isolated event. Incident reports show this was not an isolated event; the plant has had four fires in the last four years.Any such blaze renders air pollution control technology useless and exposes residents to dangerous levels of toxic material, including dioxins. The potential harm to the community is grave and cannot be ignored.If the proposed Project Kea incinerator were to have a serious fire, it would house more than 50,000 tonnes of combustible toxic waste, 100,000 litres of diesel, and vast amounts of several hazardous substances used in the waste processing. New report details dangerous conditions Doral, FL residents endured during three-week Covanta waste incinerator fire The report’s findings underscore the dangers that waste incineration facilities pose to Florida communities.The report found dangerous concentrations of toxic pollutants and chemical contaminants at the facility and across the city as the fire burned for almost three weeks.Analyzing official air quality reports from monitoring stations across Doral, the report found concentrations of Particulate Matter 2.5, a toxic air pollutant, at levels deemed “unhealthy” by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as early as February 14th, despite the Miami-Dade County’s early official statements that there were no air quality or environmental safety concerns from the fire. Exposure to Particulate Matter 2.5 is linked to various health conditions, including asthma, decreased lung and organ function, and irregular heartbeat.The report found concentrations of volatile organic compounds, chlorine, carbon monoxide, and hydrogen cyanide in the air at levels that the EPA deems immediately unsafe for human exposure, highlighting the urgent need for action.   Read full report

Florida W-t-E plant burns for nearly 3 weeks. Report shows plant has had four fires in last four years. Read More »

Waimate residents Protest ‘Waste to Poisons’ plant

Well over 100 Waimate residents took to the streets to show their disapproval of a proposal to build a rubbish incinerator in the Waimate district. The weekday march, which started at the Basilica carpark and concluded at the Waimate Event Centre, where SIRRL held information-sharing sessions, was a testament to the community’s determination to be heard. With slogans like ‘TRUCK OFF’ and ‘SHIT IN YOUR BACK YARD’, the community’s message was loud and clear.

Waimate residents Protest ‘Waste to Poisons’ plant Read More »

Why Waste Waimate meet with SIRRL

SIRRL representatives returned to Waimate in March 2023, giving the Why Waste Waimate (WWW) committee and other concerned residents of the Waimate district a long-awaited chance to ask questions of the company behind Project Kea. In an almost three-hour private meeting with SIRRL, WWW asked many questions of the company; some of their responses were quite frankly bizarre. READ MORE

Why Waste Waimate meet with SIRRL Read More »