WASTE

A waste-to-energy plant’s viability foremost requires one thing: waste.

SIRRL Director Paul Taylor said in a North & South magazine article that SIRRL has “understandings and agreements in place” with waste management companies that amount to a “significant chunk” of the 365,000 tonnes required because their facility will be cheaper and reduce greenhouse emissions. “The councils in a lot of places don’t actually own the waste,” Taylor explains. Instead, the company has agreements with waste contractors “such as Waste Management, Envirowaste, and Ecowaste” that collect waste on behalf of councils. 

“It would be unwise for us to go and contract a lot more at this point, because there’s considerable interest from a number of the larger waste collection companies, but for commercial reasons we can’t really talk about it.”

SIRRL'S RESOURCE CONSENT APPLICATION

SIRRL’s  Operational Technical Overview (OTO) Report, page 16, states that the proposed plant will burn 1000 tonnes of waste daily, 365 days a year. 

365,000 tonnes annually, which the company states will be made up of:

  • 50% Municipal Solid Waste (MSW): 182,500 tonnes
  • 50% Construction Waste (CW):         182,500 tonnes

The OTO report states that the waste is anticipated to come from: 

  • Christchurch: 71%,      259,150 tonnes
  • Dunedin: 15%,                 54,750 tonnes
  • Central Otago: 14%,       51,100 tonnes

The OTO report, page 21, table 7, provides data sourced from the Ministry for Environment (MfE) for waste volumes disposed of by landfill between 2015 and 2021

The South Island figures for 2021 are:

  • Class 1 (municipal solid waste or MSW) landfilled          804,686 tonnes
  • Class 2 (construction and demolition fills) landfilled:      651,413 tonnes
  • Farm Dumps:                                                                           384,866 tonnes

Total:                                                                                           1,800,965 tonnes

The report has combined class 1 & 2 landfill figures with farm dumps to arrive at 1,800,965 tonnes of available waste in the South Island. The report states, SIRRL “has secured access to approximately 365,000 tonnes, which equates to just 20% of the total available quantity of waste.”

The report also states that SIRRL has signed conditional heads of agreement with waste suppliers to provide the plant with the yearly waste volumes.

But do these figures add up?

 

FARM dumps

The report fails to provide any method for acquiring waste from farm dumps. This would need to involve collecting each individual farm from the entire South Island and transporting the waste to Glenavy for incineration. 

Clearly, this is not viable, so let’s subtract the 344,866 from the 1,800,965, which brings us back to 1,456,099 tonnes of waste available.

 

Class 1 landfills and class 2 landfills

The OTO report provides an approximate waste composition (table 4, page 17), sourced from Solid Waste Analysis Protocol (SWAP) data produced by the Christchurch City Council in 2019.

The table provides figures for recyclable and compostable content from class 1 and class 2 landfills as follows:

 

  • Recyclable paper and cardboard         15.88%
  • Recyclable plastics:                                  5.30%
  • Compostable green waste:                    15.64%
  • E-waste                                                       0.88%
  • Kitchen food waste:                                  0.03%

TOTAL:                                                             37.73% = 549,386 tonnes

 

Non-combustibles.

The table also provides a list of non-combustible materials that provide no calorific value when put through the incinerator, including;

  • Glass                                                       2.23%
  • Concrete, ceramics and rubble           3.77%
  • Metals                                                     2.00%

TOTAL:                                                         8.00% = 116,487 tonnes

 

If recyclable and compostable material were correctly sorted and recycled using currently available recycling practices, waste would not contain recyclable and compostable material. Using the data provided by SIRRL, that’s 37.73% of the available class 1 & 2 landfill material.

As mentioned, glass, concrete, ceramics, rubble, and metals hold no calorific value and, therefore, will not provide any energy recovery benefit when processed through an incinerator; it will actually end up as part of the resulting bottom ash, which the company claims it will landfill until better options become available, if at all.

 

This 8% non-combustible material equates to a further 116,487 tonnes. 

 

 

If we take the combined class 1 & 2 landfill material and subtract the recyclable, compostable, and non-combustible material, we get 790,226 tonnes.

South Island class 1 & 2 landfills                                            1,456,099

recyclable/compostable content:                                               549,386

non-combustible content:                                                            116,487

TOTAL:                                                                                            790,226 tonnes

 

So, while SIRRL claims that the proposed Waimate incinerator will require only 20% of the South Island’s 1,800,965 tonnes of available waste stream, that overall figure includes recyclables, compostable material, non-combustibles, and waste disposed of in private farm dumps. If this material is removed from the waste stream, Project Kea’s required 365,000 tonnes per year amounts to approximately 46% of the available class 1 & 2 landfill content, not 20%.

 

Potential for further recycling.

The OTO report, table 4, also provides a list of waste, including other potentially recyclable materials, including; 

  • Soft plastics:                                                    6.83%
  • Clothing and textiles:                                      7.73%
  • Timber                                                             15.95%

TOTAL                                                                   30.51%

 

If this potentially recyclable material were to be removed from the future waste stream, it would deplete the waste quantities even further, perhaps by as much as 30%, or 237,068 tonnes.

Recycling initiatives

Initiatives currently available in New Zealand use soft plastics that are otherwise non-recyclable. Futurepost produces recyclable products, including fence posts and garden beds. This company has recently expanded into the South Island, and founder Jerome Wenzlick stated that it would use as much soft plastic as possible.

Recycling initiatives also use clothing and textiles made from natural materials.

SIRRL has stated that approximately 50% of the waste they will burn, will be sourced from construction waste (CW). In some parts of Europe, up to 95% of all construction waste is currently recycled.

 

Better sorting, reusing, and recycling initiatives will diminish available waste consent over time. Waste Management NZ has invested heavily alongside councils in building modern landfills. Both of these companies have publicly stated that they will not support waste-to-energy in NZ.

Waste Management NZ is the largest waste management company in New Zealand. In the past, they have explored the option of building a waste-to-energy plant in New Zealand. In fact, the company owns and operates plants in China. However, they concluded that the numbers did not stack up to build a plant in New Zealand, citing a lack of waste, and the investment cost.

Waste Management New Zealand and an amalgamation of Canterbury councils own the Kate Valley landfill, which currently landfills around 300,000 tonnes of waste annually. Numerous other major landfills provide disposal for most of the South Island’s waste. 

 

SIRRL’s OTO report states that 15% of the 365,000 tonnes the proposed incinerator requires will be sourced from Dunedin, which is 54,750 tonnes. Dunedin’s council owned Green Island landfill, disposes of approximately 40,000 tonnes of waste annually.

Companies like Waste Management and Envirowaste are well-established in New Zealand. Numerous councils contract them to provide waste collection, sorting, recycling, and disposal options. They also control the majority of the available waste stream in New Zealand. Without their support, it is a big ask for any emerging competitor requiring almost half of the available waste stream, which is already spoken for, to gain a foothold in the South Island.

Add in the huge risk for councils to ditch current contracts in favour of a waste-to-energy plant that’s reliant on the operators having to win contracts with numerous other councils and private waste management companies throughout the South Island. Councils are responsible for providing reliable waste collection and disposal methods for their ratepayers. If a council did decide to ditch current contracts in favour of W-t-E, only to find that the W-t-E company couldn’t secure the amount needed from numerous other sources, then that council would be forced to renegotiate contracts with alternative waste management companies, which would likely result in rate increases to cover any difference.

 

The BERL report into waste-to-energy incineration.

As stated, SIRRL’s proposed Waimate plant would be required to compete with well-established waste management companies to secure the waste. This would require them to provide potential customers with a gate fee lower than their competitors. Surely, the two main waste management companies in New Zealand will adjust their gate fees to compensate and will probably be better placed to squeeze the W-t-E plant out of the market. See BERL report on waste to energy.

So, if SIRRL is unable to effectively source waste within the South Island, then what? Import waste?

The building of overcapacity W-t-E plants overseas has resulted in companies importing waste to keep their plants running.

Westport 2018 - Importation of Waste from Australia and Pacific Islands

SIRRL and REL director Paul Taylor was asked in a recent short film by Frank Films if importing waste was an option. His response was no.

Taylor was also asked in a North & South magazine article if SIRRL would import waste. Taylor’s response was “We would never embark on a plant if we thought that we were likely to have to import waste.”  

 In 2018, SIRRL’s NZ subsidiary shareholder Renew Energy Ltd (REL) proposed a W-t-E plant for Westport on the West Coast of the South Island. When asked, why Westport? Then operating manager David McGregor said “because it is near a port for the importation of waste from Australia and the Pacific Island’s.”  Around the same time REL had discussions with the Marlborough District Council. Renew talked about barging waste from Marlborough and perhaps further, to site for the proposed Westport plant. They also had plans to incinerate grape marc (the waste material from wine production), and broken tanalised posts from vineyards.

Renew directors Leonard Hugh Grey, Robert Bruce Grey, and Paul Donald Le Gros among others, are involved in the wine industry.

The Manahau barge

Renew Energy shareholder’s Leonard and Robert Grey are also involved in mining on the West Coast of the South Island. Leonard Grey is a shareholder and director of West Coast Mineral Sands (WMS Group) who with financial funding from the government, purchased a large 7,000 tonne capacity barge called the Manahau to export mineral sands from the West Coast to international markets, including China.

WMS subsidiary company West Coast Bulk Logistics also leases and operates the ports of Greymouth and Westport. Therefore, Renew’s shareholders certainly have the resources available to import waste on the barges return voyages.

Along with Leonard Grey, West Coast Regional Council councillor and Renew Energy shareholder, Mark McInyre is also a shareholder of WMS Group subsidiary company, WMS Group Land co. 

 

It’s worth mentioning that SIRRL’s OTO report page 16 of its resource consent application states that Renew Energy will be contracted to collect and supply waste for the Waimate Incinerator.